Representation of Gays in Hollywood

During the intersection code, there were very few representations of sprightly and lesbians on screen. The only few representations were change with stereotypes and lacked variety. People will call individually other when they see another fairylike person on TV. The layer lines in movies featuring lights and lesbians were controlled and restricted. The whole story was not practically told in gay movies. Even subsequently the code was lifted, Hollywood put away struggled with their delineation of gays, the proud sissies and the regular gays who were not as flamboyant. In todays movies, those issues atomic number 18 still prevalent. Gay scenes be fastened with comedy and as a level of punishment.There are not enough genuine, reliable gay love stories any much. The notion of visibleness at any cause still exists today, maybe not as herculean as it was in the 30s. I am starting to believe that films do not creates stereotypes provided rather the flock behind these fi lms. Directors, producers and even actors creates and perpetuate the stereotypes and feeds them to the audience. merely changing the films alone will not be enough to solve gay stereotypes in Hollywood. The change should start with the population making the films. Perhaps we need more(prenominal) gay directors or less stereotyping straightaway directors or better yet directors with free minds.Fleming disagrees with Russos views on gay visibility in Hollywood. She is not as affirmatory as Russo. Flemings point somewhat the lack of lesbian perspective in Hollywood films was very interesting. But what stood protrude the most was the point she made roughly the dilemma of gays in Hollywood. If they become more visible, they open themselves up for ridicule but if they remain invisible then they are allow Hollywood to keep portraying them stereotypically. Overall, Fleming believes that there should be more cooking stove and diversity in gay story lines and I